Why you’re drowning in reactive data engineering work (and losing your shot at promotion)
Unfiltered data engineering tasks inflate cloud costs, bury your wins, and stall promotions. Learn why one intake rule is your path to visibility.
Hi fellow data nerd, Yordan here,
Monday, 09:00
You and I finally carve out half a sprint to retire two legacy Kafka topics that churn €18 k/month of needless storage on the Snowflake staging cluster we babysit.
10:17
Finance blurts “blocker” in Slack and needs a one-off backfill for last night’s trade files.
11:30
An analyst demands another “urgent” ELT pipeline tweak for a dashboard no one uses.
By lunchtime
The Airflow queue is purple, EMR spot nodes are burning, and that Kafka-retirement ticket is shoved back into limbo.
When you check the cost dashboard, that technical coup is buried under a mountain of urgent pings, while the bill spikes, your name stays off the scoreboard.
The savings no one sees die first. The noise everyone hears wins every time.
You don’t enforce a hard intake gate
The avalanche you never saw coming
You and I start the week with a clear objective: kill those two legacy Kafka topics that bleed €18 k/month in staging storage. We build the timeline, estimate the downstream impact, even warn the SREs about the decommission.
And then, without a whisper, it all unravels.
09:15: A Slack DM from Finance: “Blocker: Tonight’s backfill or P&L is wrong Monday morning.”
09:45: An analyst drops another ad hoc ELT tweak in JIRA: “Need fresh numbers for CFO deck, critical.”
10:10: Your pager goes off for a failed DAG in production. Some customer report exploded.
By 10:30, you’re knee-deep in unplanned EMR spot cluster restarts, ad hoc SQL edits, and untested scripts.
That Kafka ticket quietly slips off your board and into next sprint’s abyss. You didn’t see it happen. It just crashes the party, buries your priorities, and leaves you digging out.
Urgency hijacks not just your time, but your identity
Every time you sprint to patch a broken DAG, there’s a rush, a hit of validation from stakeholders who clap you a hero. But at what cost?
You pride yourself on being the backbone: the one who always delivers, no matter the hour.
Yet every “hero moment” trains your brain to chase alerts, not architect solutions.
You start measuring worth by how many pages you silence, not by how many pipelines you streamline.
Ask yourself: when was the last time you felt that same pride wrapping up a Kafka decommission or merging a Terraform PR? If your pulse only pounds for the latest emergency, you’ve been tricked into equating reactivity with mastery.
The soul-crushing treadmill of reactive firefighting
There’s something deeply numbing about living on an eternal loop of alerts:
Alert chime at 22:00: “Failed task in Airflow.”
Three quick commands later, the DAG is green again.
Next ping: “Need schema change on PROD tables. That’s a blocker for billing.”
You log into AWS console in one tab, Snowflake in another, our IDE in a third.
You mouse-over metrics: CPU spikes, backfill durations, error rates. By the time the adrenaline wears off, it’s past midnight, and tomorrow’s backlog is already twice as long.
Your best hours vanish in reactive purgatory, and you re left wondering where the time went.
When your best work dies in silence
Remember the euphoria of cutting EMR cluster node-hours in half? Or finally reducing that Glue job from 4 hrs to 20 min? Neither does anyone else.
Those wins land in a silent PR merge. No applause, no “nice work.”
Meanwhile, the next “urgent” Slack ping gets all the attention.
You build infrastructure that should be a headline. Instead it’s invisible maintenance.
It stings to admit it, but you pour our smartest hours into optimisations that disappear beneath the flood of reactive tasks. Meanwhile, the cloud bill climbs and your name stays off the scoreboard.
How this mistake eats away at your career
Here’s the brutal truth:
Without a gate, you’re not a strategic leader, but a human interrupt handler.
Visibility drains away. Stakeholders only see the next midnight page, not the infra you architected.
Influence diminishes. Your voice in planning shrinks because you never finish the projects you pitched.
Promotion stalls. Management equates impact with headline-grabbing outages fixed, not behind-the-scenes savings delivered.
You feel the knot in your gut every time you miss another career milestone because you were saving someone else’s urgent Tuesday instead of building your own five-year roadmap.
That gut-wrenching regret is good. It means you’re starting to see the real cost of letting every ping in without a filter.
Draw a progress bar labeled “Visibility → Promotion” moving backward as red “urgent” arrows flood in.
How a gateless backlog cannibalises your infrastructure
No intake gate = no ranking: the free-for-all begins
You watch your backlog balloon every time you skip that one simple decision: “Does this save or protect at least €X this quarter?” Without that gate, every task stakes a claim:
A junior analyst’s “urgent” CSV fix lands next to your Kafka cleanup ticket.
A product manager’s “critical” schema tweak crowds out your Terraform refactor.
A midnight Slack ping for a tiny backfill squeezes past the same pipeline you planned for real savings.
When every ask can label itself “blocker”, you lose the ability to rank by real impact. You end up spinning wheels on the most urgent noise, never on the projects that could actually slash costs or stabilize the stack.
Chaos masquerades as throughput theatre: the vanity metrics trap
We tell ourselves we’re “crushing it” because the dashboard shows 80 new DAGs deployed, 50 Glue jobs created, or 120 JIRA tickets closed. But here’s the truth:
False momentum: Each new pipeline feels like progress, even if it’s one-off plumbing nobody reuses.
Invisible toil: While you and I pat each other on the back for throughput, we’re actually sinking hours into integration and backfills.
Perverse incentives: Stakeholders see the number of tickets closed and think you’re untouchable, so they escalate more tickets.
That dopamine hit from “tickets closed” blinds you to the haunting metric you can’t ignore: the cloud bill that keeps climbing, month after month, with zero shout-outs for what you didn’t build because you were busy building the wrong things.
Invisible technical debt snowballs into real dollars
Every workaround you push live (hardcoded endpoints, temporary tables, unversioned SQL scripts, you name it), adds a brick to the wall of technical debt.
You nod when colleagues admit “we’ll refactor later”, but “later” never comes, because “later” is always hijacked by the next “urgent” ask.
A runaway dbt full-refresh that nobody disabled chews €5 k in Snowflake credits at 02:00, unseen by dashboards until the monthly invoice drops.
An unapproved schema change in production forces a one-off backfill script that hanging around as “temporary”, but never actually gets cleaned up.
Custom Spark transformations built overnight for a one-time report ossify into maintenance work for the next team.
That hidden debt is paid in two currencies: extra hours on call and cold, hard cash on the cloud bill.
You shoulder the first. The finance team absorbs the second, until the CFO asks why costs keep ballooning.
When waste eats budgets
The worst part? The people signing the checks see only the high-level numbers:
Cloud bill spikes: they call you on it.
You explain “backfills” and “DAG failures”: they nod, glaze over.
Next month, same spike: they assume it’s “data growth”, not your process gaps.
You get a reputation for “always fixing things”, but not for “always improving things.”
That reputation keeps you tethered to reactive firefighting, in a loop where your best infra work never gets the airtime it deserves. Your career growth stalls right alongside the uncontrolled budget.
Senior ICs get trapped despite knowing better
Competence tax burdens you with busywork
You’ve earned a reputation for turning around ELT fixes in minutes, so everyone routes around the intake process straight to your inbox. That “quick win” feels good in the moment, but it comes at a cost:
Bypassing the gate: A product lead DM’ing you directly for a schema tweak, skipping sprint planning and any cost justification.
Single-threaded bottleneck: You’re the only one who knows the Git workflow for that Terraform module, so every infra change lands back on your plate.
Invisible overtime: You end up late-night-patching because “it’ll take you two minutes”, even though it eats your dedicated architecture time.
Every time you accept that shortcut, you reinforce the path of least resistance—and bury your own roadmap under a mountain of trivial asks.
Is this resonating with you? I'd greatly appreciate your feedback in the form of a quick testimonial.
Hero bias tricks you into thinking firefighting is valuable
Nothing sparks more adrenaline than saving a pipeline at 3 AM, and stakeholders shower you with thanks. Until it happens again next week.
That rush is addictive:
Dopamine loop: Each alert you silence feels like a mini-victory, so you chase the next one instead of preempting issues.
Misplaced pride: You measure success by how many midnight tickets you close, not by how many incidents you prevented.
The “urgent” spike: You train the business to rely on your reflexes, turning “late-night hero” into your default job description.
In the long run, you’re not an architect, but a human alarm system.
And no one promotes the guy who always shows up to fix last night’s mess. I know, because I was that guy.
Platform guilt fuels your anxiety
You know that if a key Airflow DAG stays down, trade-data lands in the wrong bucket or billing reports break. That knowledge becomes its own prison:
What-if paralysis: You feel compelled to hot-fix every anomaly, even if it’s a cosmetic metric or a sandbox job.
Unpaid risk: You shoulder liability for fragile pipelines, but the real decision-rights belong to upstream teams.
Invisible stress: You worry about the “big outage” that could happen any night, so you never really clock out.
That guilt trains you to treat every glitch like a five-alarm fire, rather than a signal that the real fix belongs upstream.
And when you live in that mindset, you never free up the headspace to build the next-generation infra you actually want on your résumé.
Last thoughts
You’re not drowning because the tech is too hard. No! You’re drowning because you’ve never been taught to say “no” in a language the business understands.
Think about it: what happens when you treat data pipelines like mere plumbing instead of strategic levers?
You become invisible. Your success metrics vanish, and your influence evaporates.
But imagine the opposite: when you and I guard our time with a gate that only lets truly valuable work through, we transform from “just engineers” into the linchpins of cost control and growth. We become partners in the business story—not afterthoughts.
Next Wednesday, we’ll go beyond the diagnosis and hand you the scalpel with The Prioritisation Playbook.
No more guessing. No more firefighting as a defining trait. Just a clear, repeatable system that turns your backlog into a roadmap and your infra wins into board-room wins.
This is more than process. It’s your career’s turning point.
If you felt that knot in your gut tighten as you read, you’re ready. Subscribe to the paid plan today, and be first in line when the playbook drops.
Let’s make sure your next big promotion is powered by strategic impact, not just another midnight hero story.
Thanks for reading,
PS: Are you serious about stepping into career development? My course my Stakeholder Influence System will teach you everything you need to become a strategic data partner and get more buy-in.